021-7997973 | Hotline 08111211504
SIP Law Firm Logo
SIP LAW FIRM
Home
About
Legal Services
Our Team
Resources
Press ReleasesCase Studies
Platforms
Contact Us

Alternative Settlement of Confiscation of Third Parties’ Assets in Corruption Cases

27 October 2022inARTICLES
Share
Corruption Cases

In making a corruption case verdict, a panel of judges is authorized to impose additional penalties in the form of confiscation of the defendant’s property. The confiscated assets will be  destroyed or under the control of the state.

However, in many cases, some of the assets confiscated from the defendant  belong to third parties, who or that had nothing to do with the corruption cases. These third parties have the rights to take legal action based on Law No. 30/2002 on the the Commission for the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption.

Article 19 Paragraph 2 of Law No. 30/2002 stipulates that a third party  can file an objection to the Anti-Corruption Court where the corruption case is being heard, no later than two months after the court’s verdict is issued. Unfortunately, Law No. 30/2002 does not mention in detail how the objection is filed and what legal motion can be taken against verdicts by the anti-corruption court through its panel of judges.

In 2021, there was a sharp increase in the number of cases filed by third-parties against assets confiscated by the anti-corruption courts. These cases were largely filed by financial and securities management companies that were made third parties in many corruption cases.

In 2022, the Supreme Court issued the Supreme court Regulation (Perma) No. 2/2022 on the Procedures for Resolving Objections of Third Parties against the Verdict on the Confiscation of Goods Not belonging to the Defendant in a Corruption Crime Case.

Article 2 of Perma No. 2 /2022 stipulates that the court that has the right to accept the case of an objection by a third party is the court for criminal acts of corruption at the district court or military court which examines, hears and decides on the corruption case at the first level.

Article 3 Paragraph 2 of Perma No. 2/2002 stipulates that the third party that or who can file an objection is the owner, guardian, guardian of the owner of the goods, or the receiver in the case of bankruptcy of an item, either wholly or partly which is subject to confiscation. However, the receiver can file an objection request only if the decision on the declaration of bankruptcy is issued before the start of the investigation.

Based on Article 4 Paragraph 1 Perma No. 2/2022, objections must be submitted no later than two months after the court’s verdict on the corruption case is issued in a trial open to the public. Meanwhile, Article 4 Paragraph 2 of Perma No. 2 of 2022 stipulates that in the event that the corruption case is an appeal or cassation decision, the objection is submitted no later than two months after the excerpt/copy of the verdict is notified to the public prosecutor, the defendant and/or announced on the court notice board and/or electronically.

Based on Article 14 of Perma No. 2/2022, the submission of objections from third parties in good faith is free of charge.

After filing an objection by a third party, based on Perma No. 2/2022, the panel of judges will provide legal products to justice seekers in the form of determinations.

After the decision from the Corruption Court was issued, justice seekers were still given the opportunity to take other legal motion. Efforts that can be made against the determination of the court of first instance is to file a cassation, as stipulated in Article 15 paragraph 1 of Perma No. 2/2022.

The cassation registration must be accompanied by a cassation memorandum as stated in Article 16 Paragraph 2 of Perma No. 2/2022. If the cassation request is not accompanied by a memorandum of cassation, the clerk of the court shall make a statement addressed to the chief of the court. The chief  of the court will declare that the determination of the cassation application unacceptable and the case file of the application will not be sent to the Supreme Court.

However, Article 20 of Perma No. 2/2022 states that against an appeal and/or determination of an objection that has permanent legal force, extraordinary legal motion or review (Peninjauan Kembali) cannot be submitted.

Therefore, based on Perma No. 2/2022, the last legal motion that can be taken for third parties with is an appeal.

Author / Contributor:

 Ikra Rhama, S.H., M.H, C.L.A

Associate

Contact:

Mail       : ikra@siplawfirm.id

Phone    : +62-21 799 7973 / +62-21 799 7975

 

 

About Author

Muninggar S

Muninggar S

Written by Muninggar S, part of the SIP Law Firm team delivering insights and updates on the latest legal developments.

Read Profile →

More on this category

  • Memahami Dolus dan Culpa pada Tindak Pidana
  • Reformasi Regulasi Sertifikasi ISPO: Kewajiban Baru bagi Industri Bioenergi Sawit
  • Buktikan Keunggulan di Top 100 Indonesian Law Firms 2026, SIP Law Firm Raih Gelar Managing Partner of the Year

Pinned Posts

  • Peringatan Resmi terhadap Modus Penipuan yang Mengatasnamakan SIP Law Firm

    13 MAR 2026inARTICLES
  • SIP Law Firm Partners Named to The 200 Club 2026 by Hukumonline

    03 MAR 2026inARTICLES
  • Indonesia’s Halal Certification: Legal Framework and Global Market Strategy

    29 SEP 2025inARTICLES

Ask Us Legal Questions!

Click here to ask a question to our legal experts

Ask a question illustration

We Can Speak on Your Media

View our media experts or contact us to request for your next program

Media experts illustration

We are here to help

Get in touch now to let us know how we can help you. Connect with our LinkedIn and subscribe to our newsletter to stay updated with our latest updates.

Contact Us
Connect on LinkedIn
SIP Law Firm Logo

Full-Service Legal Solutions with Integrity and Professionalism Since 2011

Indonesia's Leading #EcoLawFirm🍀

All Rights Reserved of SIP Law Firm © 2026
Supported by SIP Corp

Services

  • Legal Services & Practice Areas
  • Intellectual Property
  • Find a Media Expert

Platforms

  • SIP-R Consultant
  • Regulasip
  • SIP Library
  • Book Publications

SIP Law Firm

  • About Us
  • Awards and Recognitions
  • Our Team
  • Info
  • Career
  • Sustainability Reports
  • Contact Us
Jakarta Head Office

No. 7 Building, Jl, Buncit Raya No.7, Jakarta Selatan 12760, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia

Phone : +62-21 799 7973
Phone: +62-21 799 7975
Fax : +62-21 799 7981
E-mail : head-office@siplawfirm.id
Yogyakarta Branch Office

Prima SR Hotel & Convention Lt.3 Jalan Magelang KM.11, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Phone : +62-274 2880777
E-mail : yogyakarta-office@siplawfirm.id
Surabaya Branch Office

Puri Regency Bussines Centre Jl. Puri Jambangan Baru III, No.19, Blok AK, Surabaya, Indonesia

Phone : +62-31 9900 3117
Fax : +62-31 9900 3110
E-mail : surabaya-office@siplawfirm.id

SIP Law Firm The Best Law Firm in Jakarta

SIP Law Firm is a law firm providing premium legal solutions for local and international clients based in Jakarta. The firm has two representative offices in Yogyakarta and Surabaya.

Largest Litigation Practice of the Year - Hukum Online - Juara 1 - 2025

SIP Law Firm is a law firm ranked first in the Largest Litigation Practice of the Year 2025 category by Hukumonline. This recognition affirms SIP Law Firm's standing as a leading litigation practice in Indonesia, with a strong and consistent focus on handling strategic and complex litigation matters across various sectors.

SIP Law Firm Provides Health Law Services

We provide comprehensive Healthcare Legal services for all those involved in the healthcare industry, such as healthcare employment contracts, medical supplier agreements, healthcare business acquisitions, medical disputes, etc. Our Healthcare Legal team has years of experience handling major cases in the medical world related to facilities, medical practitioners, and other related matters.

Trusted Intellectual Property and Patent Consultant

SIP Law Firm, through SIP-R Consultant, provides legal consultation and advice to assist clients in protecting their Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and Patent Rights. We provide legal advice, assist with IPR registration, and handle patent disputes in court. The SIP-R Consultant team has been trusted by individual clients, SMEs, and multinational corporations across various industries, including the creative industry, musicians, fashion, technology, and others.

SIP Law Firm Pioneer of Eco Law Firm